| Follow Ups | Post Followup | Inkjet Refilling Talk |
| Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series | |
|---|---|
| Author: john | February 4, 2004 at 02:01:25 |
| in reply to: Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series posted by john on February 2, 2004 at 20:25:31 | |
|
> > > It appears that the newest assault on recyclers by these > > > two companies is to produce a cartridge so small that the > > > sponge material just baarely holds the OEM assigned amount, > > > and the on successive refills the sponge material will not > > > hold a full fill. > > > > I find #56 and #57 dead easy to refill easier than the #45 > > and #78 <here this for home use> Think with the #56 / #57 / > > #58 HP had in mind to make printers far more compact and > > lower indeed they have done this. > > > > Also the new carts are a lot lighter Inertia is MUCH reduced to printer is more responsive and faster. > > Downside is refill amount for homeusers is progressively reduced :( > > > > So for volume printing keep a 9XX printer Thats my tactic. > > Think in future HP need to go the canon route ie a > > removable head and seperate ink tanks in fact they should > > have it now for home printers. > > > > Summing up #56/57/58 great quality of output but ink misers. > > > > John |
  | |
| Follow Ups | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Post Followup | ||
| Served by ruboard %VERSION%; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. | ||