Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series (Inkjet Refilling Talk)

Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series
Author: john	February 2, 2004 at 20:25:31
in reply to: Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series* posted by john on February 2, 2004 at 20:17:41*

> > It appears that the newest assault on recyclers by these
> > two companies is to produce a cartridge so small that the
> > sponge material just baarely holds the OEM assigned amount,
> > and the on successive refills the sponge material will not
> > hold a full fill.
>
> I find #56 and #57 dead easy to refill easier than the #45
> and #78 <here this for home use> Think with the #56 / #57 /
> #58 HP had in mind to make printers far more compact and
> lower indeed they have done this.
>
> Also the new carts are a lot lighter Inertia is MUCH reduced to printer is more responsive and faster.
> Downside is refill amount for homeusers is progressively reduced :(
>
> So for volume printing keep a 9XX printer Thats my tactic.
> Think in future HP need to go the canon route ie a
> removable head and seperate ink tanks in fact they should
> have it now for home printers.
>
> Summing up #56/57/58 great quality of output but ink misers.
>
> John

Follow Ups

Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series john 02:01:25 2/4/2004 (0)

Post Followup

Name:
Password:
E-Mail:
Subject:
> > > It appears that the newest assault on recyclers by these > > > two companies is to produce a cartridge so small that the > > > sponge material just baarely holds the OEM assigned amount, > > > and the on successive refills the sponge material will not > > > hold a full fill. > > > > I find #56 and #57 dead easy to refill easier than the #45 > > and #78 <here this for home use> Think with the #56 / #57 / > > #58 HP had in mind to make printers far more compact and > > lower indeed they have done this. > > > > Also the new carts are a lot lighter Inertia is MUCH reduced to printer is more responsive and faster. > > Downside is refill amount for homeusers is progressively reduced :( > > > > So for volume printing keep a 9XX printer Thats my tactic. > > Think in future HP need to go the canon route ie a > > removable head and seperate ink tanks in fact they should > > have it now for home printers. > > > > Summing up #56/57/58 great quality of output but ink misers. > > > > John
Optional link URL:
Link title:
Optional image URL: