Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series (Inkjet Refilling Talk)

Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series
Author: john	February 2, 2004 at 20:17:41
in reply to: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series* posted by Michael Kay on November 30, 2003 at 20:44:40*

> It appears that the newest assault on recyclers by these
> two companies is to produce a cartridge so small that the
> sponge material just baarely holds the OEM assigned amount,
> and the on successive refills the sponge material will not
> hold a full fill.

I find #56 and #57 dead easy to refill easier than the #45
and #78 <here this for home use> Think with the #56 / #57 /
#58 HP had in mind to make printers far more compact and
lower indeed they have done this.

Also the new carts are a lot lighter Inertia is MUCH reduced to printer is more responsive and faster.
Downside is refill amount for homeusers is progressively reduced :(

So for volume printing keep a 9XX printer Thats my tactic.
Think in future HP need to go the canon route ie a
removable head and seperate ink tanks in fact they should
have it now for home printers.

Summing up #56/57/58 great quality of output but ink misers.

John

Follow Ups

Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series john 20:25:31 2/2/2004 (1)
- Re: HP 56/57/58 and Lexmark 10N series john 02:01:25 2/4/2004 (0)

Post Followup

Name:
Password:
E-Mail:
Subject:
> > It appears that the newest assault on recyclers by these > > two companies is to produce a cartridge so small that the > > sponge material just baarely holds the OEM assigned amount, > > and the on successive refills the sponge material will not > > hold a full fill. > > I find #56 and #57 dead easy to refill easier than the #45 > and #78 <here this for home use> Think with the #56 / #57 / > #58 HP had in mind to make printers far more compact and > lower indeed they have done this. > > Also the new carts are a lot lighter Inertia is MUCH reduced to printer is more responsive and faster. > Downside is refill amount for homeusers is progressively reduced :( > > So for volume printing keep a 9XX printer Thats my tactic. > Think in future HP need to go the canon route ie a > removable head and seperate ink tanks in fact they should > have it now for home printers. > > Summing up #56/57/58 great quality of output but ink misers. > > John
Optional link URL:
Link title:
Optional image URL: